SW-Precache is a great Service Worker tool from Google. It is a node module designed to be integrated into your build process and to generate a service worker for you. Though you can use sw-precache out of the box, you might still wonder what happens under the hood. There you go, this article is written for you!
This post was first published at Medium
Overview
The core files involving in sw-precache are mainly three:
service-worker.tmpl
lib/
├ sw-precache.js
└ functions.js
sw-precache.js is the main entry of the module. It reads the configuration, processes parameters, populates the service-worker.tmpl template and writes the result into specified file. Andfunctions.js is just a module containing bunch of external functions which would be all injected into the generated service worker file as helpers.
Since the end effect of sw-precache is performed by the generated service worker file in the runtime, a easy way to get an idea of what happens is by checking out source code inside service-worker.tmpl . It’s not hard to understand the essentials and I will help you.
Initialization
The generated service worker file (let’s call it sw.js for instance) get configuration by text interpolation when sw-precache.js populating service-worker.tmpl .
var precacheConfig = <%= precacheConfig %>;
var precacheConfig = [
["js/a.js", "3cb4f0"],
["css/b.css", "c5a951"]
]
It’s not difficult to see that it’s a list of relative urls and MD5 hashes. In fact, one thing that sw-precache.js do in the build time is to calculate hash of each file that it asked to “precache” from staticFileGlobs parameter.
In sw.js, precacheConfig would be transformed into a ES6 Map with structure Map {absoluteUrl => cacheKey} as below. Noticed that I omit the origin part (e.g. http://localhost) for short.
> urlToCacheKeys
< Map(2) {
"http.../js/a.js" => "http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0",
"http.../css/b.js" => "http.../css/b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951"
}
Instead of using raw URL as the cache key, sw-precache append a _sw-precache=[hash] to the end of each URL when populating, updating its cache and even fetching these subresouces. Those _sw-precache=[hash] are what we called cache-busting parameter*. It can prevent service worker from responding and caching out-of-date responses found in browsers’ HTTP cache indefinitely.
Because each build would re-calculate hashes and re-generate a new sw.js with new precacheConfig containing those new hashes, sw.js can now determine the version of each subresources thus decide what part of its cache needs a update. This is pretty similar with what we commonly do when realizing long-term caching with webpack or gulp-rev, to do a byte-diff ahead of runtime.
*: Developer can opt out this behaviour with dontCacheBustUrlsMatching option if they set HTTP caching headers right. More details on Jake’s Post.
On Install
ServiceWorker gives you an install event. You can use this to get stuff ready, stuff that must be ready before you handle other events.
During the install lifecycle, sw.js open the cache and get started to populate its cache. One cool thing that it does for you is its incremental update mechanism.
Sw-precache would search each cache key (the values of urlsToCacheKeys) in the cachedUrls, a ES6 Set containing URLs of all requests indexed from current version of cache, and only fetch and cache.put resources couldn’t be found in cache, i.e, never be cached before, thus reuse cached resources as much as possible.
If you can not fully understand it, don’t worry. We will recap it later, now let’s move on.
On Activate
Once a new ServiceWorker has installed & a previous version isn’t being used, the new one activates, and you get an activate event. Because the old version is out of the way, it's a good time to handle schema migrations in IndexedDB and also delete unused caches.
During activation phase, sw.js would compare all existing requests in the cache, named existingRequests (noticed that it now contains resources just cached on installation phase) with setOfExpectedUrls, a ES6 Set from the values of urlsToCacheKeys. And delete any requests not matching from cache.
existingRequests.map(function(existingRequest) {
if (!setOfExpectedUrls.has(existingRequest.url)) {
return cache.delete(existingRequest);
}
})
On Fetch
Although the comments in source code have elaborated everything well, I wanna highlight some points during the request intercepting duration.
Should Respond?
Firstly, we need to determine whether this request was included in our “pre-caching list”. If it was, this request should have been pre-fetched and pre-cached thus we can respond it directly from cache.
var url = event.request.url
shouldRespond = urlsToCacheKeys.has(url);
Noticed that we are matching raw URLs (e.g. http://localhost/js/a.js) instead of the hashed ones. It prevent us from calculating hashes at runtime, which would have a significant cost. And since we have kept the relationship in urlToCacheKeys it’s easy to index the hashed one out.
* In real cases, sw-precache would take ignoreUrlParametersMatching and directoryIndex options into consideration.
Navigation Fallback
One interesting feature that sw-precache provided is navigationFallback(previously defaultRoute), which detect navigation request and respond a preset fallback HTML document when the URL of navigation request did not exist in urlsToCacheKeys.
It is presented for SPA using History API based routing, allowing responding arbitrary URLs with one single HTML entry defined in navigationFallback, kinda reimplementing a Nginx rewrite in service worker*. Do noticed that service worker only intercept document (navigation request) inside its scope (and any resources referenced in those documents of course). So navigation towards outside scope would not be effected.
* navigateFallbackWhitelist can be provided to limit the “rewrite” scope.
Respond from Cache
Finally, we get the appropriate cache key (the hashed URL) by raw URL with urlsToCacheKeys and invoke event.respondWith() to respond requests from cache directly. Done!
event.respondWith(
caches.open(cacheName).then(cache => {
return cache.match(urlsToCacheKeys.get(url))
.then(response => {
if (response) return response;
});
})
);
* The code was “ES6-fied” with error handling part removed.
Cache Management Recap
That’s recap the cache management part with a full lifecycle simulation.
The first build
Supposed we are in the very first load, the cachedUrls would be a empty set thus all subresources listed to be pre-cached would be fetched and put into cache on SW install time.
Set(0) {}
Map(2) {
"http.../js/a.js" => "http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0",
"http.../css/b.js" => "http.../css/b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951"
}
[sw] GET a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0
[sw] GET b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951
After that, it will start to control the page immediately because the sw.js would call clients.claim() by default. It means the sw.js will start to intercept and try to serve future fetches from caches, so it’s good for performance.
In the second load, all subresouces have been cached and will be served directly from cache. So none requests are sent from sw.js.
Set(2) {
"http.../js/a.js? _sw-precache=3cb4f0",
"http.../css/b.css? _sw-precache=c5a951"
}
Map(2) {
"http.../js/a.js" => "http.../js/a.js? _sw-precache=3cb4f0",
"http.../css/b.js" => "http.../css/b.css? _sw-precache=c5a951"
}
The second build
Once we create a byte-diff of our subresouces (e.g., we modify a.js to a new version with hash value d6420f) and re-run the build process, a new version of sw.js would be also generated.
The new sw.js would run alongside with the existing one, and start its own installation phase.
Set(2) {
"http.../js/a.js? _sw-precache=3cb4f0",
"http.../css/b.css? _sw-precache=c5a951"
}
Map(2) {
"http.../js/a.js" => "http.../js/a.js? _sw-precache=d6420f",
"http.../css/b.js" => "http.../css/b.css? _sw-precache=c5a951"
}
[sw] GET a.js?_sw-precache=d6420f
This time, sw.js see that there is a new version of a.js requested, so it fetch /js/a.js?_sw-precache=d6420f and put the response into cache. In fact, we have two versions of a.js in cache at the same time in this moment.
http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0
http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=d6420f
http.../css/b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951
By default, sw.js generated by sw-precache would call self.skipWaiting so it would take over the page and move onto activating phase immediately.
http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0
http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=d6420f
http.../css/b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951
Set(2) {
"http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=d6420f",
"http.../css/b.css?_sw-precache=c5a951"
}
http.../js/a.js?_sw-precache=3cb4f0
By comparing existing requests in the cache with set of expected ones, the old version of a.js would be deleted from cache. This ensure there is only one version of our site’s resources each time.
That’s it! We finish the simulation successfully.
Conclusions
As its name implied, sw-precache is designed specifically for the needs of precaching some critical static resources. It only does one thing but does it well. I’d love to give you some opinionated suggestions but you decide whether your requirements suit it or not.
Precaching is NOT free
So don’t precached everything. Sw-precache use a “On Install — as a dependency” strategy for your precache configs. A huge list of requests would delay the time service worker finishing installing and, in addition, wastes users’ bandwidth and disk space.
For instance, if you wanna build a offline-capable blogs. You had better not include things like 'posts/*.html in staticFileGlobs. It would be a huge disaster to data-sensitive people if you have hundreds of posts. Use a Runtime Caching instead.
“App Shell”
A helpful analogy is to think of your App Shell as the code and resources that would be published to an app store for a native iOS or Android application.
Though I always consider that the term “App Shell” is too narrow to cover its actual usages now, It is widely used and commonly known. I personally prefer calling them “Web Installation Package” straightforward because they can be truly installed into users’ disks and our web app can boot up directly from them in any network environments. The only difference between “Web Installation Package” and iOS/Android App is that we need strive to limit it within a reasonable size.
Precaching is perfect for this kinda resources such as entry html, visual placeholders, offline pages etc., because they can be static in one version, small-sized, and most importantly, part of critical rendering path. We wanna put first meaningful paint ASAP to our user thus we precache them to eliminate HTTP roundtrip time.
BTW, if you are using HTML5 Application Cache before, sw-precache is really a perfect replacement because it can cover nearly all use cases the App Cache provide.
This is not the end
Sw-precache is just one of awesome tools that can help you build service worker. If you are planing to add some service worker power into your website, Don’t hesitate to checkout sw-toolbox, sw-helper (a new tool Google is working on) and many more from communities.
That’s all. Wish you enjoy!